commerce clause的意思

commerce clause中文翻譯：

商業條款，貿易條款

相似詞語短語

conscience clause───道德條款（說明因其宗教或道德的原則不能遵守某一規定時，可不受處分的法律條款）

commercialese───n.商業語言；商業用語

commercialise───使商品化；靠…賺錢；使商業化

conscience clauses───道德條款（說明因其宗教或道德的原則不能遵守某一規定時，可不受處分的法律條款）

object clause───賓語從句

reserve clause───[計]保留子句；[法]保留條款

complement clause───補充條款；補語從句

concessive clause───讓步從句

commercial college───商學院；商業專科學校

雙語使用場景

At present, there are three strands to commerce clause theory.───在當前, 《商業條款》理論有3個組成部分.

Never before has the Commerce Clause and Necessary and Proper Clause been extended this far.───商業條款和必要及適當性條款以前從未被擴大至此.

such statutes valid, or are they preempted by federal law or in violation of the Commerce Clause?───這些法令是否正當？聯邦法律對于這些法令是否擁有先占權？這些法令是否違背《商業條款》？收藏。

The basis for federal court involvement is the commerce clause of the Constitution.───聯邦法院參與的依據是憲法中的《商業條款》.

Today the commerce clause is broadly interpreted.───今天,關于對商業條款的解釋是有很多的.

commerce clause reaches essentially any private activity that has significant environmental consequences.───商業條款》基本上觸及到了一切可能產生重大環境后果的私人活動。

Such legislation is virtually immune from restriction under the commerce clause.───按照《商業條款》,該立法不受限制的影響.

On the whole , however, environmental laws have fared well in commerce clause litigation.───然而,從總體上講, 環境法從《商業條款》訴訟中獲益匪淺.

The guiding precedent [ on the Commerce Clause ] is informative but inconclusive.───( 憲法的商業條款 ) 這一導向性的先例令人大開眼界但卻帶有不確定性.

The commerce clause provides the authority for Congress to pass most of the federal environmental regulations.───(憲法中的)商業條款規定大部分聯邦環境法規都是由國會通過的.

This makes it a discriminatory law and unacceptable under the Commerce Clause.───這使它成為一項歧視性的法律和不可接受根據商務條款.

These laws raise an important commerce clause question that affects many, many industries nationally, and I believe the courts need to respond.───這些法規提出了一個重要的商業條款問題，它將影響全國的許許多多行業，我認為，法院需要作出回應。

英語使用場景

At present, there are three strands to commerce clause theory.

The Commerce Clause was not drawn with a view to having the validity of state laws turn on such pointless distinctions.

To be sure, this Court has construed the Commerce Clause to accommodate unanticipated changes over the past two centuries.

That legislative effort is clearly impermissible under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.

This makes it a discriminatory law and unacceptable under the Commerce Clause.

The guiding precedent [ on the Commerce Clause ] is informative but inconclusive.

Accordingly, Congress simply lacks power under the Commerce Clause to displace state regulation of this kind.

The basis for federal court involvement is the commerce clause of the Constitution.

The labeling requirement violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution, according to the lawsuit.