appellant的意思
appellant中文翻譯:
n.上訴人
adj.上訴的
appellants───n.上訴人;adj.上訴的
appellate───adj.上訴的;受理上訴的
appendant───adj.附屬的;附加的;n.附屬物;附屬品
expellant───adj.有驅除力的;逐出的;n.驅除劑;排毒藥
repellant───adj.讓人不愉快的;防……的(等于repellent);n.驅蟲劑;防水劑(等于repellent)
appendants───adj.附屬的;附加的;n.附屬物;附屬品
expellants───adj.有驅除力的;逐出的;n.驅除劑;排毒藥
propellant───n.推進物;推進燃料;發射火藥;adj.推進的
rappelling───v.繞繩下降(rappel的現在分詞)
appellant may file a final reply brief to the appellee's brief.───上訴人可以根據被上訴人的摘要遞交最后的回應摘要。
Whereas the property is held in trust for the appellant.───鑒于財產是為上訴人托管的。
The appellant shall also be informed of any right to further appeal.───上訴人還應被告知可進一步上訴的任何權利。
The appellee will respond to the appellant's brief with its own legal arguments and interpretations of the facts from the record.───被上訴人將用自己的法律論據及對記錄中事實的解釋來對此摘要做出回應。
a collegiate bench shall be formed by the court of second instance for the appellant case to hold a hearing.───人民法院審理第二審民事案件,由審判員組成合議庭。合議庭的成員人數,必須是單數。
The appellant shall also be informed of any rights of further appeal .───并應將進一步上訴的任何權利通知上訴人。
his right to appeal, of the time limitation, and of the competent appellant court.───宣告判決時,必須告知當事人上訴權利、上訴期限和上訴的法院。
The respondent was of the view that the appellant, the appellant infringement is justified, the decision is correct, should be maintained.───被上訴人答辯認為,上訴人侵權成立,原判正確,應當維持。
Appellant objected to the court's holding that his interest in the disputed tract of land was a fee simple determinable.───上訴人質疑法院判決其就訴爭土地的權益為可終止完全所有權。
The appellant's wife was acquitted of aiding and abetting the appellant on count 4 and discharged.
The appellant was concerned in a conspiracy to defraud the clearing banks of £60,000.
The appellant was found in possession of 1.03 grammes of heroin.
The appellant, Norman Mattison, was charged with committing an act of gross indecency with his co-defendant.
Special considerations: there was no indication that the appellant was suffering from psychiatric disorder.
In each case the appellant has been found guilty of contempt of court and has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment.
The appellant was convicted of wounding with intent.
The defendant did not commence proceedings against the appellant until 7 March 1988.
The appellant did not give evidence.