legal reasoning的意思

legal reasoning中文翻譯：

法定推理

相似詞語短語

reasoning───adj.推理的；n.推理；論證；評理；v.推論；說服（reason的ing形式）

legal───n.（Legal）（法）勒加爾（人名）；adj.法律的；合法的；法定的；依照法律的

fallacious reasoning───謬論

abductive reasoning───[計]反繹推理

reasoning test───推理測驗

verbal reasoning───語文推理；文字推理，語言推理

reasoning skills───推理能力

rational reasoning───理性推理

analogical reasoning───類比推理

雙語使用場景

Kagan emphasised her “modest” approach to legal reasoning. See article───卡根注重使用“謙遜”的方式實現法律推理。

Legal reasoning is the basis of just judgment.───法律推理是形成公正判決的基礎。

Even more importantly, it largely endorsed the commission's legal reasoning.───更重要的是，它同意該委員會絕大部分的法律推理。

Legal reasoning has been the dual nature of the logical method and the judicial system; it has a evolvement from the former to the later.───法律推理具有邏輯方法和審判制度的雙重屬性，它的發展經歷了一個從前者向后者的演進過程。

The objectivity of legal reasoning is one of the subjects which need to be researched in the theory of law and judical practice.───目前，法律推理客觀性問題在理論界和司法實踐中都是急需研究的課題之一。

In preparing his brief he gave only two pages to conventional legal reasoning and citation of precedents.───他在準備辯護狀時，僅用兩紙進行通常的法律推理和援引判例。

This allows readers to see the legal reasoning that kept the justices holding the minority view from agreeing with the majority decision.───這就使讀者能夠看到持少數觀點的大法官不同意多數大法官決定的法律論據。

In the case of GE and Honeywell the European Court of First Instance criticised the commission's legal reasoning, but upheld its decision.───對于通用電氣和霍尼韋爾的案子，歐洲初審法院雖然批評了歐盟委員會的法律推理但仍然支持其決定。

As the decision-making process, legal reasoning runs through the justice and provides legal reasons and justification for justice.───法律推理是貫穿司法審判活動始終的，是為司法審判提供法律理由和正當理由的法庭決策過程。

英語使用場景

Deductive legal reasoning is a reasoning method which regards law as major premise, case as minor premise, and deduces conclusion from the major and minor premise.

At the level of legal reasoning these developments can not be accommodated within the traditional contractual conception of the company.

The underlying approach of codification in re-forming the law has stressed the mechanistic nature of legal reasoning as essentially a syllogistic exercise.

The argument just concluded studied legal reasoning in cross-section, the details of controversy case by case.

In the process of a judge' s trial, the legal reasoning is a major premise of law modes, a minor premise of case fact identification and a deduction proof model based on the major and minor premises.

We are confined to the research taking logic as the basis much to legal reasoning so far, this is one kind of legal formalism. And the value-judgment has certainty in legal reasoning.

But not like the natural science, the axiom of legal reasoning is"value-judgment", and the values can not be agreed by all the people.

The third part, in the normative and limitations of formally legal reasoning of the discussions, and the people for a long time for a traditional logic in the form of misunderstanding.